In this article, we will discuss the differences between Athena EHR and eClinicalWorks EMR, as well as why Athenahealth was able to beat out eClinicalWorks in the KLAS survey. We will also examine the iSalus EHR and Product Selection Tool. The differences between these two products are so stark that comparison is necessary to make an informed decision.
Athena EHR vs eClinicalWorks EMR:
Athenahealth is a privately held company that offers electronic health records for midsize practices. Its technology extends the use of electronic health records beyond the practice walls and creates community-wide records. This EHR software has a customer base of over 80,000 physicians and 472,000 medical professionals. Its market cap is over $5 billion and it is listed on the NASDAQ. The company has been in business since 1997 and has over 25,000 medical practices as customers.
Each of the two platforms offers a variety of features to meet the unique needs of healthcare providers. The Athena EHR is designed for healthcare providers, while eClinicalWorks is best for independent medical organizations. The AthenaOne EHR features customizable modules to accommodate specific industry needs. This ensures greater efficiency and ROI. However, it may come with hidden costs that aren't visible to the user.
Athenahealth outperforms eClinicalWorks in KLAS:
The Best in KLAS rankings are based on customer feedback, and Athenahealth outperformed eClinicalWorks EMR by a significant margin. For the second year in a row, athenahealth was ranked best in its segment of small practices: ambulatory practice. It outranked competitors such as Cerner, HealthEC, and NextGen Healthcare, among others. In addition to this, it also outscored eClinicalWorks EMR by a small margin. Best in KLAS surveys involve clinicians, administrators, and 2,500 outpatient clinics.
Athenahealth outperforms iClinicalWorks in all categories of KLAS evaluation, including the overall satisfaction of customers. Its customer satisfaction scores are higher than those of eClinicalWorks, which is also a cloud-based clinical solution. Athenahealth has partnered with Kaiser Permanente to offer its electronic medical record services to its Kaiser Permanente members, which should boost care quality, efficiency, and patient outcomes. Additionally, its EHR service will give patients remote access to their medical information.
iSalus EHR vs eClinicalWorks EMR:
iSalus is an EHR with a unique focus on work-life balance. The company's website boasts an implementation time of 60 days or less and boasts a high feature set. Though they no longer advertise free EHR plans, they position themselves as a low-cost option. In fact, iSalus has a negative rating with the Better Business Bureau (BBB) of Indiana and is known for its unethical billing practices, including overbilling practitioners they don't know. And their customer support team is unresponsive. This is a big factor in their lack of popularity.
MedGen also touts an easy-to-use product that costs a fraction of eClinicalWorks' subscription fee. While the price tag of their software may be lower, the product is highly feature-rich and easy to use. The company's website offers a checklist of features that make it appealing to medical practices and allows you to test a demo without speaking with an actual human.
You can also checkout EHR systems for all your medical needs.
Product Selection Tool vs eClinicalWorks EMR:
Both the eClinicalWorks EMR software and the Product Selection Tool are electronic health record software. They offer a variety of features, including electronic medical records, Telehealth, Order Accept & Rejection, and ContinuLink. They are both Web-based and include many features, such as patient portals and scheduling. The following table compares both products, taking into account scalability, ease of use, and customer support.
Security is another concern for medical practices. Both EMR programs must be HIPAA-compliant, but different ones have varying levels of data security and accessibility. Make sure that your chosen EMR program has the level of security you need for the sensitive data you collect. Consider whether your existing data security is enough for your needs and goals. Some programs are more secure than others, and you can choose based on security requirements.
Both products support On-Demand Activation, which makes it easy to interact with technology. This technology helps create a truly connected office where technology and patients work together seamlessly. These applications are also compatible with Epic and Cerner hospitals and can support CommonWell Health Alliance and Carequality frameworks. They both provide tools for patient engagement and improved care outcomes. A key advantage of eClinicalWorks is its streamlined workflow.